Robot-Dogs to start security patrolling Florida military base: The 325th Security Forces Squadron, which handles and manages security for the base
Robot-Dogs to start security patrolling Florida military base: The 325th Security Forces Squadron, which handles and manages security for the base, mentioned the robot dogs are weatherproof, 4-legged, unmanned patrolling drones that have 2-way communication functionality and high technology sensors that value about $100,000 a pop.

“It is a springboard into the way forward for integrated defense,” squadron commander - Maj. Jordan Criss advised the outlet at the latest demonstration on base. “That is just the first step, and what we are very excited to do is be that test and evaluation site which proliferates the remainder of this technology for the rest of the Air Force.”

By February 2021, the squadron expects to have 4 of the robot dogs in place across the base’s perimeter, the place they can either roam on their own or be operated by hand for up to 7 hours before they’ll have to hit a charging station.

“They’re not there to harm anyone; they're there to be an additional set of ears and eyes for our defenders,” Criss defined.

“They can do in-depth terrain analysis and improve the situational consciousness for our defenders.”

The drone dogs have been in development for over ten years by Pennsylvania’s Ghost Robotics. Their CEO, Jiren Parikh, mentioned they had been created to keep people and military working dogs secure within the area while additionally mitigating “heavy asset losses,” the outlet mentioed.

While the not-so-furry sentries received “bite,” if somebody makes an attempt to steal or in any other case “harm” the robot, a protection mechanism is triggered that will harm the predator. Tyndall is the first army base in the nation to make use of the new technology.

Axact

AndroBliz

Welcome to AndroBliz, the apprise in technology. While we serve you with daily pizza in terms of updates, do hook up with us on our social media platforms below.

Post A Comment:

0 comments: